| |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Summary
By Joel Conkling and Michael Rogol
What is the true cost of solar power? A detailed review of the
cost structure for crystalline silicon based solar power systems
surprised us. Today, the fully-loaded cost (cost not price) of
solar electricity is $0.25/kWh or less in most of the OECD
countries. Within three years, the fully-loaded cost is likely
to fall below $0.15/kWh for most of the OECD and reach $0.10/kWh
in sunnier regions. These cost levels are driving three emerging
trends: (1) vertical integration of the supply chain; (2)
origination of power purchase agreements (PPAs) by solar power
companies; and (3) unexpected risk for traditional Gencos, grid
operators and turbine manufacturers. Overall, the rapid
deployment of solar power on a much larger scale is nearly
inevitable if interest rates remain low. This report presents
detailed analysis of the current cost structure of the solar
sector, estimates the cost of delivering solar power in 2010 and
identifies companies most likely to benefit, including Conergy,
REC, SolarWorld, SunEdison, SunPower, Motech and Suntech.
Grid parity in many markets today
Today: $0.25/kWh. While the price of installed solar
systems is typically $7 to $8/W, the fully-loaded cost of these
systems is under $4/W today. This takes into account all costs
of manufacturing and installing solar systems from pre-silicon
to connected installation without incentives or tax benefits.
Similarly, the price of solar power without incentives is
typically $0.50/kWh, but the fully-loaded cost is $0.25 or less.
At these cost levels, solar power is currently at or below
parity with the price of residential electricity for 5-10% of
residential electricity consumption in the OECD.
|
|
Cost of solar
at grid parity
for more than 50%
of OECD residential
customers by 2010 |
|
By 2010:
$0.10-$0.15/kWh. Incremental improvements in solar power
manu-facturing, installation and financing will reduce the cost
of solar power over the next four years. The most important
drivers of cost reduction will likely be cell efficiency gains,
increased scale, and other factors such as better financing
terms for systems. Conservative estimates of cost are $0.15/kWh
by 2010 for typical locations. Taking into account potential for
faster cell efficiency gains and larger savings from vertical
integration, $0.10/kWh is a realistic estimate of cost in
2010.
Even at $0.15/kWh, the cost of solar power will be below grid
parity for more than half of residential customers and 10% of
commercial customers in the OECD, as long as grid electricity
prices do not decrease through 2010. The other key risk to this
view is significantly higher interest rates. Detailed analysis
and interviews with companies from across the value chain
confirm these results.
Emerging trends: Integration, PPAs,
risks for traditional
Gencos
|
|
Rapid growth in
solar volume,
decreases in costs,
integration and
solar PPAs create
risks for traditional
energy companies |
|
Solar companies are
aggressively pursuing vertical integration to ensure that they
can deliver electricity below grid price. The leading examples
are REC and SolarWorld with Conergy, SunPower and Suntech making
significant moves toward full integration in recent months. The
result: these companies are increasingly able to offer
electricity instead of components. Companies that do not
integrate will be forced to share profits with suppliers and
customers, and may not be able to approach costs of $0.10 per
kWh.
There may be significant first-mover advantage for companies
that sign customers who currently pay high grid-based
electricity prices into long-term solar power purchase
agreements (PPAs), and signs of a »land-grab« for those
customers are increasingly apparent. A rising number of
customers in key market segments are entering into solar PPAs,
including utilities, governments, big box commercial customers
and residential customers.
Given the rapid pace at which solar production is expanding,
solar electricity could emerge as a genuine threat to the
economics of existing Gencos, grid operators and turbine
manufacturers. Traditional electricity providers make a large
portion of their profits at times of peak demand, which occurs
almost precisely when solar electricity production is at its
highest. As a result, even a relatively modest level of solar
electricity production threatens to disproportionately affect
the profitability of established electricity producers.
Potential winners and losers from
a disruptive technology
|
|
Very fast
earnings growth
is likely for the
best solar players |
|
The best-positioned
companies to benefit from this trend are integrated solar
players (REC, SolarWorld, SunPower, Suntech). In addition,
downstream companies with the skills necessary to originate
power deals in multiple markets have very strong growth
potential (e.g. Conergy and SunEdison).
Beyond solar companies, the rapid growth of solar installations
augmented by the emergence of long-term solar-fueled PPAs has
potential to significantly alter expectations of grid economics.
A shift in peak power price assumptions may enter net present
value (NPV) models for existing baseload power plants, existing
gas peaking plants and new turbines.
This report provides detailed analysis showing that the cost of
solar is lower than most people think and will continue to fall
through 2010.
For inquiries, please contact:
info@photon-consulting.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
This report provides detailed analysis showing that the cost of solar is lower than most people think and will continue to fall through 2010.
|
|
 |
|
|